[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Auto-completion in editors
Yes, But.... It is usually feature choices. Again, the problem of XML it is just a syntax and a syntax editor even if augmented with a structural editor isn't enough. Once past these, it depends on the actual application but I think they will have a many features in common. Note: a compound document will be a freakin' nightmare for the editor vendor but that is why they get the money they get for these beasties (inquire into the price of a *good* animation system). Off the top: 1. Multiple representations with integrated operations. In VRML, I need a treeview, dialogs, libary browsers, a pickable rendering view and the ubiquitous ASCII editor. Because it is a real time rendering system, I need timeline based event editors, behavior objects, and so forth. Because it is a ROUTEd language (events cascade), I need a way to pick on one object and get a display of available interfaces and engines, plus the option to create new ones (note that VRML routes through from event sources and sometimes through intermediaries such as timers to behaving objects - simple pipeline descriptions don't quite work here). 2. I need to be able to configure or disable "helper" features such as intellisense and color coding. We can argue over initial states, ie, on by default. 3. I need to export and import, translate and transform. I'm sure others can add to that list. Yes, they can get in the way, but so far I've been not too unhappy with XML Spy, Topolologi, and the still working Professional File Editor. Parts and assemblies: it's in the way that you use it. len -----Original Message----- From: Andrzej Jan Taramina [mailto:andrzej@c...] Len said: > Yes. Although the complexity of the application, > the use of high level editing controls that are > inserting library objects, and so on influence my > decisions on this. Different languages require > different tools. XML is great for the overall > generic tool, but this falls apart in the crunch. > > VRML is my best example. I need the IDE editor because: I agree with you wholeheartedly. The difficulty is that IDE's (in my experience) rarely provide the high level power and constructs that would be useful in a way that is unintrusive and simple. They "get in the way" more often than not (your example of automatic insertion of quotes is a good example of this). Don't get me wrong....if someone comes up with a good IDE for XML and especially XMLSchemas I'll be on my knees thanking heaven. But I have yet to see one (market opportunity....hint....hint!). Same with IDE's for Java/C/etc programming languages.....I have yet to see one that does not get in my way more than I can bear (and I have used all the big names). If you have found a good VRML IDE (something I have no need for personally) then that is super! 'nuff said. Andrzej Jan Taramina Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions http://www.chaeron.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|