[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: There is


the language of diplomacy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven R. Newcomb" <srn@c...>
To: "Nicolas Lehuen" <nicolas.lehuen@u...>
Cc: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>; "'Jeff Lowery'"
<jlowery@s...>; <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:33 PM
Subject: Re:  AF and namespaces, once again (was Re: 
There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)


> > Disclaimer : I just read David Megginson's
> > documentation of XAF [1], which implements a subset
> > of AFs for XML. I'll try to read [2] in the future,
> > especially for the meta-DTD part, but right now my
> > brains just melt at the idea of reading a document
> > which calls its sections 'subclauses'. Apparently
> > those people like giving complex names to trivial
> > concepts :P.
>
> It's all in the interests of precision and clarity.
>
> In my 16 years of standards work, I've learned that if
> you want a standard to work, you have to think like an
> engineer.  But if you want it to be adopted, you have
> to think like a politician.  The two mindsets are
> sometimes incompatible.  Where they were incompatible,
> I've generally chosen to make the standard really work,
> in preference to early, easy adoption.  For me, it's a
> professional thing.
>
> The other approach, however, tends to enjoy quicker
> success.  It is not an accident that the notoriously
> vague French language is the traditional language of
> diplomacy.  For some reason, vagueness is generally
> more palatable.  I regret that the precise language
> that I, among others, have labored to produce is so
> off-putting for so many people.  I know no other way to
> make a standard that can withstand the stress of
> implementation and deployment, while actually meeting
> its original requirements.

Wooops I should have made sure that none of 'these people' were reading the
list before writing that :P. I've received a few private answers due to this
remark, so please accept my apologies if I offended anyone.

My point was just that I was looking for a introductory document to AFs and
found that the difference between David's very practical introduction [1]
and the original specs' extensive use of never-seen-before terms [2] was
quite amusing.

After sending my mail, I did find an introductory article by W. Eliot Kimber
[3] which was referenced on xml.com's resources on AFs [4].

For my defense, may I cite Mr Kimber ?

"Like any formal mechanism, the SGML architecture mechanism has its own
jargon, which while internally consistent, may not always be intuitively
descriptive in a general context."

That was exactly what I meant.

Best regards & my apologies,
Nicolas

[1] http://www.megginson.com/XAF/
[2] http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/wg8/docs/n1920/html/clause-A.3.html
[3] http://www.isogen.com/papers/archintro.html
[4] http://www.xml.com/pub/rg/Architectural_Forms



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.