[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
Dare Obasanjo wrote: > I'd prefer a convention based on the URL type in combination with a repository > similar to UDDI and web services. For instance namespaces that have URI's that > begin with "xmlns://" can be submitted to a registrar where their > document/resources (maybe even RDDL files) are passed along to node operators > who replicate the data across several nodes at regular intervals. Great. I have no problem with this. You should write it up and submit it to the IETF as an RFC. You could specify exactly what and how you the URI is to be resolved. I assume RDDL is being used primarily with URIs of the "http" scheme so the mechanisms wouldn't interfere with eachother in the least. Is anyone using RDDL with URI schemes other than "http" ? Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|