[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: HGRAB. Syndication. Google. Grey area.
> 2) Caching a copy locally (as Google does) probably does constitute > copyright infringement -- witness the standard copyrights in > books that > prohibit electronic copying. My guess is that this hasn't been > prosecuted because (a) it is useful and (b) Internet law is > still in its > infancy. I've heard the argument that bits while in transit between publisher and reader do not constitute a copy, and that a cache is purely a holding area for bits in transit. I don't know whether m'lud would accept that, or even understand it. It certainly doesn't cover any kind of syndication, though, where the simple rule is that you can link to content but you can't copy it, or present it as your own. I'm sure a lawyer would give you a much more complicated explanation (and a more expensive one, and probably far less clear-cut). Mike Kay
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|