[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
>-----Message d'origine----- >De : Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@i...] >Envoyé : mercredi 30 janvier 2002 14:25 >À : xml-dev >Cc : srn@c... >Objet : Co-operating with Architectural Forms > > >How do AFs help in this situation? > >I'll hazard a response to this question, just to outline my confusion. >For an AF based solution we get together with X and Y and define >a meta-DTD. I then re-tool to process data according to the >meta-DTD, and do the appropriate AF magic to process A & B >according to this meta-DTD. > >Isn't this more work? That's what I was telling myself, but I'm not sure I have fully understood AFs. It seems that format B needs to be redefined to include references to the common architecture, is it right ? If I have understood it well, the B DTD needs to be modified to include mappings to AFs and the document instances in format B must be modified to include PIs that refer to their AF ? In that case, isn't this process more intrusive and costly than having an external mapping mechanism ? Regards, Nicolas
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|