[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a mea

• To: 'Jonathan Borden' <jborden@m...>, Mike Champion <mc@x...>, The Deviants <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:06:30 -0600

Problem is, DTDs don't seem to be dieing as ordained.  Now 
we have a moreorless permanent incompatibility by design.
Brilliant.

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...]

The single biggest problem I have with XML is the lack of compatibility
between XML Namespaces and DTDs. But guess what? XML Namespaces appears to
have won and DTDs have lost. 

• Prev by Date: Re: Auto-completion in editors
• Next by Date: RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: RE: misprocessing namespaces (was Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Next by thread: Fw: SAX 2.0.1 is out!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread