[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: [O/T] RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: [O/T] RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:02:50 -0600

I think you are right, but I got it from 
Bill and Ted.  And a friend of mine who 
was touring with them at the time assures 
me they really are the experts on the subject, 
particularly, Gene. ;-)

len

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Boyce [mailto:SteveB@h...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 10:00 AM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject:  [O/T] RE:  Xml is _not_ selfdescribing


> But it's good enough for rock n'roll.  To quote 
> the most respected experts in that subject domain, 
> "God gave rock n' roll to you, put it in the 
> soul of everyone."  KISS 

Actually, wasn't that originally Rod Argent???

Steve


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• Prev by Date: [O/T] RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Next by Date: Re: How to validate a Schema.
• Previous by thread: [O/T] RE: Xml is _not_ selfdescribing
• Next by thread: XML restrictions on LF characters?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread