[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
> From: Alan Kent [mailto:ajk@m...] > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 12:15 AM > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft > > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:47:48PM +0100, Julian Reschke wrote: > > > The normalization of CR, LF and CRLF can be avoided by using their > > > character entities. So I still can preserve fidelity. > > > > I don't think this is true. For instance, using MSXSL, try: > > I don't think using an implementation of XSLT is a valid way to > say what the XML spec says should be done. Its always dangerous Correct. But I though it was the easiest way to demonstrate it (Saxon behaves similarily, I tested that before). Yet, it seems you are right and my example was wrong. I'm surprised, because this seems to be a very special case (normally, it doesn't matter *how* you get a character into your XML).
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|