[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: Somecomme
David Carlisle scripsit: > And you can even do that if you specify an ibm encoding and the > parser does the "obvious" thing with NEL and maps it to #10 > (whilst it is arguable that the mapping for NEL should be 85 which then > wouldn't work without xml 1.1 , this is dubious, it is clearly less > useful and it seems unnatural, one assumes that other text transfers > (eg ftp) between ibm and the ascii world map line to line ends, so it > see,s unreasonable that the mapping for xml should map ibm new lines to > #85 which isn't a line end in any ascii/unicode system and is just > presumably there to allow some kind of round tripping. And what is to be done with ASCII-encoded IBM plain text, which actually uses 85 to represent #x85? -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|