[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
RE: validating against the standard W3C
The basic problem at this point in time is being totally
sure of what the gold standard is. The W3C XML Schema Rec, particularly Part
1, seems almost designed to be impenetrable. [I have had my knuckles rapped
before for saying that, but I still believe it to be true.]
Inevitably
implementors have to interpret the impenetrable and implementors differ in how
they do interpret it. I would suggest that at this point in the development of
XSD Schema (W3C XML Schema) tools that there is some sort of safety in
numbers.
This is a wonderful proof
that formal specification is self defeating! The more formal you try to be,
the less anyone understands what you're trying to
say...
Mike
Kay
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0 |
|
Atom 0.3 |
|
|
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|