[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Formal definition of PSVI

• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>,"Joe English" <jenglish@f...>
• Subject: Re: Formal definition of PSVI
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>
• Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 22:15:00 -0800
• References: <01cd01c18133$6485f3a0$0500a8c0@carnage> <3C10D664.5050908@d...> <007a01c17f57$3e5c1930$0500a8c0@carnage> <3C10F483.8050708@d...> <3C12736F.BA4355BD@r...> <3C137E63.4040701@d...> <3C13CB64.D4CC0882@r...> <3C13FA29.1090309@d...> <200112100236.SAA00384@d...>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe English" <jenglish@f...>
To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:36 PM
Subject: Re:  Formal definition of PSVI



> REC-xml-infoset includes a [document type declaration] information
> item because <!DOCTYPE ...> declarations are part of XML 1.0.
> REC-xmlschema-* defines new information items that schema-aware
> processors must also support (i.e., a PSVI).  These new information
> items aren't part of REC-xml-infoset because they aren't part of
> XML 1.0.  Does that clarify things?
>

You clarified a number of things but the main question about where the concept
of PSVI is explained/defined and why it is important is still left much
unanswered.

Thanks for your answers.

--
THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #67
No matter how many shorts we have in the system, my guards will be
instructed to treat every surveillance camera malfunction as a full-scale
emergency.




_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Formal definition of PSVI
    • From: Nogami Kenji <nogami@c...>

• References:
  • Re: Formal definition of PSVI (was Where have the element types gone?)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>
  • Where have the element types gone?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Where have the element types gone?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <kpako@y...>
  • Re: Where have the element types gone?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Where have the element types gone?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: Where have the element types gone?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Where have the element types gone?
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: Where have the element types gone?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Formal definition of PSVI
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Formal definition of PSVI (was Where have the element types gone?)
• Next by Date: Re: Formal definition of PSVI
• Previous by thread: Re: Formal definition of PSVI
• Next by thread: Re: Formal definition of PSVI
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread