[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Parser structure (historical background question)
At 20:25 21-11-2001, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: >Historically, SGML *required* validation of the parser, so many of the early >discussions around validation assumed this. I forget who first noted that >validation is orthoganal to parsing, but I know I was an early proponent >of "lazy validation". Tim Bray's Lark/Larva good example of a pipeline >approach to this. Half of a co-poster-presentation that Gavin and I did at SGML '96 on the subject can be found at <URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/pub/raw/sgml96.ppt > (PowerPoint, sorry - I was young and naïve). Gavin's half was to cover the pipeline in a little more detail, but he got sidetracked by a car accident on the way to Boston. )-: This half of the presentation mostly deals with record-end handling, but touches on the pipeline idea. ~Chris -- Christopher R. Maden, Principal Consultant, HMM Consulting Int'l, Inc. DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training <URL: http://www.hmmci.com/ > <URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ > PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4 5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|