[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Walter Underwood's robots

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Walter Underwood's robots
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 09:59:32 -0400
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20011109123709.020beec0@p...>
• References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011109123709.020beec0@p...>

As readers of any of my XML books know, I have about three standard 
examples of processing instructions: php, cocoon, and robots. Thus I 
was a little disturbed to discover while working on an update 
yesterday that the original proposal for the robots processing 
instruction by Walter Underwood 
(http://homepages.go.com/~wunder0/robots-pi.html) has vanished from 
the net. Furthermore, Mr. Underwood's old e-mail at 
wunder@i... is bouncing. Walter, if you're out there could 
you please drop me an e-mail at elharo@m... with your 
current address? Or if anybody knows where I can reach him or where 
the robots page might have moved to, could you please let me know? 
I'd like to ask some questions about the current status and location 
of this proposal. Thanks.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: xlinkit 4.3 released
• Next by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Previous by thread: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Next by thread: Re: So maybe ID isn't a problem after all.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread