[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Caught napping!

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Caught napping!
• From: "Peter J. Gale" <thesemanticweb@y...>
• Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 13:14:37 +0000 (GMT)
• In-reply-to: <000001c1691f$7b9cc9a0$01000001@MITCHUM>

Bill, In a nutshell:

No matter how many tables you put into a design, you
can always find a need for more.

A relational database can not easily evolve with the
ever-growing needs of an internet based society.

Peter

 --- Bill de hOra <bdehora@i...> wrote: > 
> > Jens
> >
> > I disagree. We need a modelling theory, that
> allows us to 
> > focus on the logical modelling first. Then we need
> methods to 
> > map this logical model to some kind of physical
> storage. Be 
> > it a rdbms, xml-enabled rdbms, hierachical db,
> oodb or a 
> > 'native xml store'.
> 
> What's wrong with the relational data model?
> 
> regards,
> Bill de hÓra 
> 
> 
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the
> subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
>  

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Caught napping!
    • From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>

• References:
  • RE: Caught napping!
    • From: "Bill de hOra" <bdehora@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Caught napping!
• Next by Date: xml declaration in DTDs and encodings
• Previous by thread: RE: Caught napping!
• Next by thread: Re: Caught napping!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread