• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 21 Nov 2001 10:30:19 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20011121133010.01bff318@p...>
• References: <9A4FC925410C024792B85198DF1E97E401A85312@u...> <5.0.2.1.0.20011121133010.01bff318@p...>

On Wed, 2001-11-21 at 08:33, Sean McGrath wrote:
> At 18:27 21/11/2001 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> >
> >So then we get
> >   XML
> >     +/- validation
> >     +/- PSVI  contributions
> >     +/- namespace
> >     +/- Blubbery
> >     +/- ids
> >     +/- xml:base
> >     +/- xml:include
> >     +/- xlink embed
> >
> >= 256 flavours of XML systems even without addressing entity defaulting.
> >
> >Thin uncordinated layers are the recipe for non-interoperability.
> 
> Amen!

And more Amen! 

(Finally, a choir I can join!)

(Though I think it's Blueberry, not Blubbery...)
 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by Date: XSLT Preserve Space in Attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Next by thread: RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread