[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
Rob Lugt wrote: > But having an implicit declaration would create two classes of Validity. > Existing (non xmlid-conformant parsers) would declare the document invalid > whereas updated applications would declare it valid. Validity has been redefined before. For example, it used to be valid to have two different attributes of type NOTATION on a single element, but this is now invalid in the name of SGML compatibility. (It was always *meant* to be invalid, but formal invalidity entered by way of an erratum.) -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|