[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents
From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard@r...] On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 08:06:07AM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: >> If projects are shut down due to enforcement, >> that emphasizes why a patent policy is necessary, >> and why it should be flexible. Underfunding >> is not an excuse to break the law any more >> than lack of knowledge is a reason for any >> group to get a patent. >You seems to have a *very* narrow view about what free software >is (or OpenSource). It doesn't mean there is no money involved, it >means source code is accessible and redistributable. That software >also happens to usually be cheaper but it's not the point. It is true in any case. It requires funding to get a patent and more to overturn it. A policy for terms of use of patented technology in W3C products is needed. This has long been recognized by other organizations and for that reason, the W3C has emulated their policies. If a company has the funding, they can defend the open software projects from which they derive their profits. That is a cost of business for them just as it is for all of us in this business. They can also seek patents for that which they intend to have future rights. If they intend to do that with intent to grant RF RAND, I think a W3C policy that is clear with respect to the terms of such would be welcome to the management of such a company. len
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|