[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
Bullard, Claude L (Len) scripsit: > Again, why would xml:id be architecturally superior? Without > answers to that question, there is no reason to continue this > thread because the requirement has not been clearly articulated. To provide an interoperable meaning for nude-name XPointers that does not depend on any particular vocabulary, format, or schema. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|