[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: determining ID-ness in XML
But there is an architectural solution now. Some don't like it and yes, this is an architecture thread, so perhaps "selling" can wait for another thread. (See self-fulfilling prophecies). What are the architectural objections to #1? The more semantically-loaded strings we add to well-formedness, the more XML processors become RTF processors and that feels retro. Will the semantic escape always be xml:yadda? len -----Original Message----- From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] At 08:40 AM 29/10/01 -0600, Paul Grosso wrote: >Here are some options (all discussed before): >1. use the internal subset to declare IDs #1 is minimal-impact. Can it be sold? I.e., if you want the "name" attr to be an ID, then you need the following at the top of the file with a line for each element type that "name" can appear on: <!DOCTYPE rootType [ <!ATTLIST element1 name ID #IMPLIED> <!ATTLIST element2 name ID #IMPLIED> ... etc... ]> I'm not sure it's going to be easy to get the community to buy into this.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|