[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance"

• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• To: "'John.Brooking@N...'" <John.Brooking@N...>,xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 14:16:20 -0700

Yeah, this displayed horribly in my IE 5.5 browser, too.

Try running it throught the W3C's XHTML validator, though:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.opera.com/pressreleases/xhtml/2
0011026.xml

It says: "No errors found".

I guess MSN will have to start blocking IE 5.5.  ;-)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John.Brooking@N... [mailto:John.Brooking@N...]
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:28 PM
> To: Mike.Champion@S...; joshuaa@m...;
> ken_north@c...; xml-dev@l...; narahari@h...
> Subject: RE:  Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards
> comp liance"
> 
> 
> Double irony: I blindly went out to Mike's link with my IE 
> 5.5 browser (my
> company's standard), and of course my "user experience" of 
> the Opera page
> was far "less than optimal" with IE. In fact, all I saw was a bunch of
> overlaid colored squares at the the top of the page and some 
> of the link bar
> at the bottom. Still not noticing that it ended in ".xml", I 
> tried it on NN
> 4.7, which of course was pretty much blank. However, NN 6.0 
> displays it
> fine, now if only it started up faster! (Maybe I'll download 
> Opera, and make
> my desktop support people even more annoyed...)
> 

• Prev by Date: RE: Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance"
• Next by Date: Java: interface methods with same name and signature
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft's deeply cynical appealto"standards compliance"
• Next by thread: RE: Microsoft's deeply cynicalappealto"standards comp liance"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread