[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 14:38:02 -0400

On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 14:22, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> For the scope of authority over that set of 
> contract entities to which the answer can be 
> applied.

Uh, Len... I may be misreading it, but I don't see a "who" there.

"Contract entities" is not especially compelling to those of us who
currently find contracts in this field to be more bondage than blessing.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
> 
> On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 13:54, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> > o What is needed?
> > o What is possible?
> > o What is sustainable?
> 
> I'd add a "for who" to the end of all of those questions.
> 
-- 
Simon St.Laurent
"Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue

• References:
  • RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: When to Validate XML Guidelines
• Next by Date: RE: When to Validate XML Guidelines
• Previous by thread: RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
• Next by thread: RE: [Fwd: W3C ridiculous new policy on patents]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread