[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices - Versioning

• From: Tony.Coates@r...
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 11:32:10 +0100

On 05/09/2001 20:26:27 Peter Piatko wrote:

>A possible issue with 3 & 4 is that,  AFAIK, the XML Schema rec does *not*
>require instance documents to specify the  location of the associated schema.
>If a particular instance doesn't do  this, then another convention must be
>found if the instance wants to make  explicit which version it complies with.

I mentioned this elsewhere, but from my conversations with W3C Schema people, the optionality of "schemaLocation" is meant to be for exceptional cases, and definitely not the rule, so I don't think that best practice methods need (or should) assume that it cannot be relied upon.  After all, deciding on what not to leave out is part of what best practices are about.

     Cheers,
          Tony.
========
Anthony B. Coates
(1) Content Distribution Architect - Project Gazelle
(2) Leader of XML Architecture & Design - Chief Technology Office
Reuters Plc, London.
Tony.Coates@r...
========



-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices ? Versioning
• Next by Date: RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices ? Versioning
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices - Versioning
• Next by thread: Database access question for HL7 data
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread