[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Bad News on IE6 XML Support
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote, > I'm sorry but delivering the same XSLT transformation sheet to 1000 > clients takes far more resources than one simple transformation. Hmm ... pretty clearly having the client do the transform offloads work from the server, so what extra resources have you got in mind? In raw bandwidth terms your claim probably isn't true. And even in those cases where it _is_ true, it's probably not all that significant. Worst case first ... Server-side transform n x size of transformed doc Client-side transform n x (size of untransformed doc + size of stylesheet) Now, would you expect the size of the untransformed doc + the size of the stylesheet to be _vastly_ greater than that of the size the transformed doc? I wouldn't. In less worst case circumstances I would hope that the stylesheet would be cacheable (and cached, either on the client or at an intervening proxy/surrogate), so we'd have, Server-side transform n x size of transformed document Client-side transform n x (size of untransformed doc + (size of stylesheet/hit rate)) which makes the client-side transform look a lot more competitive. In fact, in the not unlikely circumstances that the transform causes doc size inflation relative to the untransformed doc, the client-side transform might well have the edge. So in the absence of solid empirical measurements I'd say this particular issue was moot. Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin InterX Internet Systems Architect 27 Great West Road +44 (0)20 8817 4030 Middx, TW8 9AS, UK msabin@i... http://www.interx.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|