[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Schema ?
> Notice that the restriction has no content. If this is valid, then is the > intent to just extend the "base64Binary" builtin type? Or assign a different > name to the "base64Binary" builtin type? I thought <restriction> was > intended to restrict a new datatype to a *subset* of an existing type? I suppose CryptoBinary can still be considered as a restriction of base64Binary. In other words, it's not an alias, although it behaves like that to some extent. I don't see anything in the spec that contradicts my interpretation. In mathematics, if A=B, then one can usually say that A is a subset of B. To exclude that possibility, one has to say that A is a proper subset of B. regards, ---------------------- K.Kawaguchi E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@y...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|