[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: I need a name
On the other hand, the universe is quite an expansion of scope. Qualfied name makes sense and invokes no laugh tests. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Ronald Bourret [mailto:rpbourret@r...] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 1:41 PM To: Richard Tobin Cc: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: I need a name The most common term seems to be "universal name". This is used informally in the namespaces rec in section 1.0.: These considerations require that document constructs should have universal names, whose scope extends beyond their containing document. This specification describes a mechanism, XML namespaces, which accomplishes this. It is also used by James Clark in his paper about XML Namespaces and in my XML namespaces FAQ. BTW, James introduces the notation {<uri>}<local-name> -- for example, {http://www.foo.com/}a -- as a way of spelling out universal names. I've used this in the FAQ as well.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|