[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Sun and independent developers

• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• To: xml-rpc@y..., soapbuilders@y...,decentralization@y..., xml-dev@l..., xml-dist-app@w...
• Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 11:30:27 -0400

Part of the problem here is that Dave Winer picked a very generic name for a very specific technology. He invented one language for embedding remote procedure calls in XML and called it XML-RPC. Sun seems to be using "XML RPC" in a much more generic sense. 

It's the same problem the W3C XML Schema Language has. There are many XML schema languages. The W3C chose to call theirs XML Schemas, or even by the more generic name schemas, without any indication that theirs was hardly the only one. 

I suppose Sun could have titled the draft "RPC in XML" or "XML for RPC" or something like that, but name conflicts do seem inevitable here. I'm afraid the specific XML application "XML-RPC" described at http://www.xml-rpc.com/ does not have a reasonable claim to exclusive use of the three letters XML, the three letters RPC, or even combinations of those two three letter strings. 
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ 
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      | 
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Sun and independent developers
    • From: Paulo Gaspar <paulo.gaspar@k...>

• References:
  • Sun and independent developers
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Sun and independent developers
• Next by Date: Re: Suggested guidelines for using local types. (was Re: Enlightenmentvia avoiding the T-word)
• Previous by thread: Re: Sun and independent developers
• Next by thread: RE: Sun and independent developers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread