[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Re: XML Schema ?
Exactly. Matthew > -----Original Message----- > From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI [mailto:kohsukekawaguchi@y...] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:08 PM > To: xml-dev@l... > Subject: Re: XML Schema ? > > > > > Notice that the restriction has no content. If this is > valid, then is the > > intent to just extend the "base64Binary" builtin type? Or > assign a different > > name to the "base64Binary" builtin type? I thought <restriction> was > > intended to restrict a new datatype to a *subset* of an > existing type? > > I suppose CryptoBinary can still be considered as a > restriction of base64Binary. > In other words, it's not an alias, although it behaves like > that to some > extent. > > I don't see anything in the spec that contradicts my interpretation. > > > In mathematics, if A=B, then one can usually say that A is a > subset of B. > To exclude that possibility, one has to say that A is a > proper subset of > B. > > > > > regards, > ---------------------- > K.Kawaguchi > E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@y... > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|