[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] UName Re: I need a name
i've sent objections on this topic to the respective authors/bodies for the schema and query model specs. as yet without success. the prevalent naming (QName) makes absolutely no sense for the domain (namespace-name, local-name) so it is good to hear another voice wondering why the misnomer is so popular. i'm at a complete loss why one does not simply use the terminology which appeared in the original recommendation "universal name", or UName for short. ... Richard Tobin wrote: > > Does any spec give a name to the (namespace name, local name) pair that > identifies an element or attribute? It's not a qualified name - that's > the string that appears in a document which is expanded into such a > pair by looking up the prefix or using the default namespace. > > The Schema Datatypes spec views these pairs as the value space of > QNames (and the lexical space is QNames in the sense of the Namespaces > spec). But that's hardly a handy name. > > -- Richard >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|