[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Namespace name: better to use URN or URL?
Title: RE: Namespace name: better to use URN or URL? This is how I feel too, however, I think we may be in the minority. Maybe the difference is the word "philosophically" - in my philosophy, a URN provides a better fit, but I think many (most?) people prefer a URL, since they can then put something there, which will provide a benefit in their situation. Philosophically, they look at the whole situation, and specifically XML Namespaces, differently than I do. (The point has also been made that it's easier to create a unique URL than a unique URN, but I'm not convinced that that's true.) Side note: RDDL changes things a little bit, for me. If I was going to describe my namespace in RDDL, I would have no trouble, philosophically, using a URL for my namespace name. Well, maybe a little trouble, since I would still be a little uncomfortable with the tying of name and RDDL document location... (From a puritanical standpoint, I would probably prefer some other kind of attribute that points to an RDDL document.) David -----Original Message-----
Philosophically, I prefer a URN. As you say, it
We've debated it endlessly, but I think using a
http://anything really is a name or a location. Identity
Len
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|