[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Enlightenment via avoiding the T-word
Nicolas LEHUEN wrote: > Yes, but as validation and typing are tightly bound in terms of algorithm, > why not perform them both in the same path, for the sheer sake of efficiency > ? When validating, you collect a lot of useful data (you know what XSDL > types you are matching against elements), so why no keep this information in > a PSVI to give it to the next layer ? From my reading of the schema spec, this is what a validator does. My point is that it would be nice if the PSVI was clearly factored so I could write a processor to just add type information without performing validation. This would be much cheaper and would be useful in applications where I trusted the source of my documents. -- Ronald Bourret XML, Databases, and Schemas http://www.rpbourret.com Speaker, Geek Cruises' XML Excursion '02
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|