[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: "Uh, what do I need this for" (was RE: XML.COM: How I Learne d to L
> Anyway, these aren't serious proposals ... just illustrations of how one > might approach the problem if people thought about what they really need > before they worried about marketing their shiny new paradigm. THAT's Edd's > point, IMHO. And my version of that point: the paradigm is old, it's the marketing that's shiny and new! Where admittedly "use XML to do this" is part of the marketing, and a part which isn't pure public relations ... because a lot more people have access to XML (though not to XML + BrandX Schemas) and HTTP than ever had meaningful access to any of the earlier "network services" components. Is this a case where cutting the price of the technology (family) will lead to wider adoption? Or have there been other reasons why the paradigm has been limited to use in custom applications, for the past decades? Stay tuned ... - Dave
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|