[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Namespaces,W3C XML Schema (was Re: ANN: SAX FiltersforNamespaceProce
> complexity than this). Using local types made schema design and > maintenance much simpler than if every element name in the schema had to > be uniquely typed. But it it also makes it harder for me to comprehend > correctly even the relatively small (1-2Kb) messages that we typcially > deal with. Maybe you do not use attributes, but if you do, do you have problems comprehending them because typically they are not in a namespace? Why are local element types different? Dave
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|