[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Simple SAX2 Proposal, v3.
Sorry, I have sent this to xml-dev instead of perl-xml by mistake :) Please ignore it, thanks. Petr Cimprich wrote: > First of all I want to say I like this version of proposal. > > Ad $name/{}$name: the first way would allow to keep SAX2 generators > compatible with SAX1, that's the only benefit I can see. I think this > "benefit" can be traded off against a consistency of the second way. > > But I have another question. start_cdata() has an empty argument in > current binding and data itself is provided by another call of > characters(). What is reason for this? Passing {Data => > $data}directly in start_cdata() would make the communication between > SAX and DOM more straightforward and just one function would be called > instead of three. Am I missing anything? > > Petr > -- Petr Cimprich Ginger Alliance www.gingerall.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|