[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Namespaces, schemas, Simon's filters.
Peter Piatko wrote: > What was the problem with the simpler interpretation that unqualified > attributes were in the same namespace as their containing element? Then > there would be no need for Per-Element-Type partitions at all (and hence the > confusion of unqualified local elements). Without the per-element-type partitions, you can have one name referring to two different attributes, possible with different types, such as the foo attribute on elements bar and baz. This is certainly possible, but seems to negate the whole point of having namespaces (unless I'm missing something). -- Ron
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|