[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why Are Schemas Hard?
Hi Evan, > You are restricting anyType here too. The shorthand version is just syntax > sugar. So I think it's actually easier to learn if you forget about the > abbreviated version until you know what the full syntax means, which is one > of the points made in the article[1]. OK, after reading the article I understand why it was written the way it was. However, to use it as an example for how verbouse XML Schemas are is a bit misleading since you can use the shorthand version. After all that's what it's there for. I agree that you should learn the basics behind the complexType and the type hierachy before you throw yourself head first into XML Schemas and this article [1] was very good indeed. Cheers, /Eddie [1] http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/08/22/easyschema.html (particularly the section aptly titled "Ambushed by Abbreviation")
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|