[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Namespaces Best Practice
>Simon St.Laurent wrote: >Mixing unqualified names with XSLT is a remarkably common >practice, and needs to be if XSLT is going to be used to generate >documents which don't themselves use namespaces. Simon, If I understand you correctly: yes it's common, but no, it doesn't need to be. An XSLT stylesheet using nothing but fully qualified element names can process a source document with all fully qualified names and create a result with as little or as much use of namespaces as the stylesheet designer wishes. >Does there need to be an "XSLT exception" or is there some general way >of describing this that might make sense within the context of (2)? I guess not! Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@ snee.com> see http://www.snee.com/bob/xsltquickly for info on new book "XSLT Quickly" from Manning Publications.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|