[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: An open plea to the W3C (was Re: XInclude vs SAX vs
So that explains the current complicated mess that is XML+Namespaces? Dare to do less. Claim more. Change the names later. I'm glad the W3C doesn't spec airliners. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] At 03:57 PM 27/08/01 -0700, Fuchs, Matthew wrote: >(However, as an aside on this topic, as an undergrad I had a classmate whose >summer job was writing test cases for the Ada validation suite. She assured >me [incorrectly] that it would be at least 10 years before anyone had an >approved Ada compiler. Of course, I later did grad work at NYU, where I got >to hobnob with the people who wrote that first compiler! ;-) Hmm, my memory seems to tell me that the first wave of Ada compilers were quite a bit more robust and reliable than the first few releases of Java. On the other hand, they didn't include a virtual machine. On another hand, my mental image of Java 1.0 is as of a fairly stripped down language with not a lot of fat, while Ada suffered from severe complete-ism from day one. Another victory for those who dared to do less. -Tim
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|