[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The Map/Territory Conundrum in Topic Maps vs. RDF

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 13:06:02 -0400

the nelson studio maps
On 19 Aug 2001 12:09:43 -0400, W. E. Perry wrote:
> At last week's Extreme Markup Languages 2001 conference in Montreal I
> heard the "map is not the territory" platitude invoked with monitory
> gravity at key moments in a number of arguments. 

The maps in some ways have become a territory in need of maps, but
that's another complicating angle...

> In markup
> the concrete instance, by incorporating both content and a particular
> gloss upon that content, is precisely both territory and map.

This is the really interesting part, I think.  In some respects, it
motivates pieces like Ted Nelson's "Embeddeded Markup Considered
Harmful" [1]. which I tend to recommend to everyone working on markup
whether they care about theory or not.

One of the most interesting things at the conference was the interplay
between the markup actually in a document and the markup various people
and organizations want to add to a document.  It was pretty clear that
different, overlapping, and even conflicting views of what may seem in
some sense to be the 'same' document are not only possible but likely.

At the same time, a number of presentations (mine included) suggested
that (X/SG/HT)ML-style markup also needs to work in conjunction with
other forms of lexical notation present in documents, acknowledging the
variety of maps built into the territory even before or in conjunction
with considering markup.  

I think the best part of the conference for me was the appearance of a
grand diversity of possible answers to possible problems.  After hearing
over and over that "we will create standards which represent information
and knowledge", it was nice to hear from a lot of people doing excellent
work in fields where that approach doesn't work.  

Multiple maps (which are themselves territories) for shifting
territories seems far more useful to me than the notion of single and
final maps for fixed territories.

[1] Nelson, Theodor Holm.  "Embedded Markup Considered Harmful."  In
_XML: Principles, Tools, and Techniques_. (O'Reilly & Associates, 1997.)
p. 129-134.  (To be proper, I should probably add a another paragraph
worth of bibliographic metadata, but thankfully it's also available at
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/w3j/s3.nelson.html)

Simon St.Laurent



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.