[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Namespaces Defined

• From: Dylan Walsh <Dylan.Walsh@K...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>,xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:32:06 +0100

Nice similes. Another cause is the fact that namespaces were created
after the XML 1.0 Rec. This forcibly lead to a solution that was more
contentious and less clean than a hypothetical "there from day one"
system.

> From:	Bullard, Claude L (Len) [SMTP:clbullar@i...]
> Sent:	Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:14 PM
> 
>A common problem of "less is more" in specs is 
>that active imaginations fill in the 
>details just like an off-camera romantic interlude in a 
>G-rated movie or a slasher scene in a horror 
>flick.  The results depend on the 
>events leading up to that unstated assumption.

• Prev by Date: xsl:number
• Next by Date: RE: Namespaces Defined
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespaces Defined
• Next by thread: RE: Namespaces Defined
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread