[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XInclude vs SAX vs validation
David Brownell wrote: > As I'm saying the purpose of XInclude should be. It's certainly > suggested by the name's analogy to #include. All the world's not C. There have been for many years more selective kinds of includes in programming languages. Consider Python's "from F import A, B, C ..." > It's a pretty huge leap to say that, for example, C/C++ doesn't have syntax > or modularity below the file level. Right. What it doesn't have is source-code addressibility below the file level. (Grove weenies, this is your opportunity to define a property set for C/C++ programs.) -- Not to perambulate || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> the corridors || http://www.reutershealth.com during the hours of repose || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in the boots of ascension. \\ Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|