[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 22:17:37 -0400

At 9:18 AM +0900 7/20/01, Murata Makoto wrote:
>>They're less than twenty of these. Such a list is not at all hard to construct. To be specific:
>
>It is very hard to construct.  See the list of charsets of IETF and RFC 2278.  
>Although peole have worked hard, the result is far from being satisfactory.
>
>ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/character-sets
>

But very few of these contain Blueberry characters. The idea is to specifically exclude all the character sets that can't possibly be Blueberry. And as I said elsewhere, it really doesn't matter all that much if we miss some, as long as we have Unicode. 
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ 
|          The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001)           |
|              http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/              |
|   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/   |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      | 
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/     |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Murata Makoto <mura034@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by Date: Re: Closing Blueberry
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: RE: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread