[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:57:36 -0400 (EDT)

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> However, the fact remains: every document that was a well-formed XML
> 1.0 document was also a well-formed XML 1.0 2nd edition document. Every
> document that was not a well-formed XML 1.0 document was also not a
> well-formed XML 1.0 2nd edition document. Ditto for validity.

Actually, we did change the definition of validity somewhat.  For example,
it is no longer valid (but still well-formed, of course) to have two
attributes of type NOTATION on a single element.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@c...
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

• References:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by Date: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread