[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)

• From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:27:38 -0400

At 03:20 PM 7/19/2001 -0400, John Cowan wrote:

>What's going on here is not "What should go into the next version of
>XML?" but rather "We have some ideas that (we think) require a new
>version, unfortunately: here they are."

That may very well be, but you must be cognizant of the fact that you will 
(and very well should) get input that says "and here are some more ideas 
that WE think are required of a new version as well".

Experience and difficulty with the current Rec are not a closed event unto 
those in the WG.

Let us listen closely, lest we end up with a Rec that solves very few 
problems (with vague indications of forward work), and then refuses to do 
so yet again.

Ann
Ann Navarro, WebGeek Inc.
http://www.webgeek.com/
Now in print! Effective Web Design, 2nd Edition
http://www.webgeek.com/books/
What's on my mind? http://www.snorf.net/blog/	

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• References:
  • Closing Blueberry
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: Closing Blueberry
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: NEL where?
• Next by Date: RE: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Next by thread: Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread