[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit: > No, I think that 90%+ of people are never going to need to use > Blueberry at all. I think that of the remainder, most of those who > are using Blueberry will know they are because all their markup will > be written in Khmer or Amharic or Mongolian and so forth. I think it > will be a very rare case, mostly limited to some Japanese and Chinese > documents (and far from the majority of those), where there may or may > not be Blueberry characters. Well, which is it? In World 1, only the people who want to use Blueberry-specific name characters use Blueberry. In World 2, everybody jumps on the Blueberry bandwagon even when they only use ASCII, and interoperability is damaged. You seem to switch between these two worlds unpredictably. -- John Cowan cowan@c... One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|