[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Blueberry is not "closed" (was: Closing Blueberry)
Ann Navarro wrote: > If the group is truly in the requirements gathering phase, it would > follow that all requirements be gathered and reviewed, without any > gate-keeping function that is making subjective judgements on whether > something is or is not appropriate, except for exceptionally extreme cases. My belief is (and again, I am *not* speaking for the Core WG officially) that we are not in a requirements gathering phase, but rather in a requirements *approval* phase. We have created our own requirements, and want the W3C and the community to bless them. What's going on here is not "What should go into the next version of XML?" but rather "We have some ideas that (we think) require a new version, unfortunately: here they are." -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@r...> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|