[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Well-formed Blueberry

• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:59:07 -0400

Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

 > An XSLT processor is a tree-to-tree transformation. The XML
 > declaration is not part of the tree. It is produced only as part of
 >  the final, optional serialization of the document. Assuming the
 > Blueberry declaration is part of the XML declaration, it would not
 > be chosen until the entire output tree was available for inspection
 >  so that the presence or absence of Bluebbery characters could be
 > definitively ascertained.

What's more (unless I am forgetting something), no name can be
generated in the output unless it appeared as a name in the input,
either the stylesheet or the source.  Blueberryness, therefore,
is contagious.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Well-formed Blueberry
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
  • Re: Well-formed Blueberry
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Well-formed Blueberry
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • RE: Well-formed Blueberry
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
  • RE: Well-formed Blueberry
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Well-formed Blueberry
• Next by Date: RE: Well-formed Blueberry
• Previous by thread: Re: Well-formed Blueberry
• Next by thread: RE: Well-formed Blueberry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread