[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Closing Blueberry
[James Clark] > I didn't exactly propose getting rid of the restrictions. Rather I > proposed that they should be distinguished from other well-formedness > errors (or moved from well-formedness into some new layer) so that they > didn't cause fatal errors. The arguments I remember were arguing why the > restrictions were good (which I agree with not) not why they should be part > of well-formedness. > In a way, then, name restrictions might be part of validation instead? Just as an attribute value is checked to see if it matches the name restrictions only if a DTD (or schema, now) declares it to be an ID/IDREF type, but this is separate from well-formed-ness. Sure, why not treat all name restrictions as part of validation? Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|