[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Blueberry/Unicode/XML

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>, Tim Bray <tbray@t...>,xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:04:10 -0500

Which is a good excuse to put the BNF into ISO 8879 
next time it comes up for revision.  The process is there. 
Use it to improve the standard.  No sensible person is 
against that.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...]

Len, you certainly are entitled to your opinion. At the end of the day, the
most significant advantage(IMHO) that XML has _over_ SGML, is that XML is
defined in EBNF. Let me say it again: XML is defined in EBNF. The importance
of this must be understood.

• Prev by Date: OT: Just a Little Explanaton for Veering (RE: Blueberry/Unicode/ XML)
• Next by Date: RE: building an object model of a XML schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Blueberry/Unicode/XML
• Next by thread: RE: Blueberry/Unicode/XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread