[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: SchemaTA (was: Newbie)
Or if a less generic term had been chosen. Why not call it "The One And Only One XML Schema Definition Language" (TOAOOXMLSDL), while we're at it ? It's a bit like if a programming language was named "Programming Language" -- it's a blatant namespace pollution :). Now we have to cope with it by specifying "W3C XML Schema schemata" or other graceful expressions... Regards, Nicolas -----Message d'origine----- De: Jonathan Borden A: Peter Flynn Cc: xml-dev@l... Date: 29/06/01 22:42 Objet: Re: SchemaTA (was: Newbie) Peter Flynn wrote: > It would perhaps have been easier if the W3C doc had been called > "XML Schemas" or "XML Schemata" rather than "XML Schema" -- > after all, we refer to documents about "XML Namespaces", not > "XML Namespace". > Or if the full name "XML Schema Definition Language" had been used in the title. -Jonathan ------------------------------------------------------------------ The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|