[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] SV: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm
Thanks, I know what 'iff' translates to. In any case, the point I'm trying to raise is that I'm not sure we will be able to keep the river helthy, or at least it won't be as easy as 1 2 3 /Dimitris -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: David Brownell [mailto:david-b@p...] Skickat: den 2 juni 2001 00:03 Till: Dimitris Dimitriadis Kopia: XML DEV Ämne: Re: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm > What's your view on if it were a public system? "iff" == "if and only if" ... public systems wouldn't have owners per se, except sometimes the custodial interest of a government. That's not an "ownership" interest, and it's one where decisions must be attuned to "seventh generation" timeframes as well as explicitly valuing diversity. That means among other things no biases towards bigger fish and against smaller ones; it's one river that everyone shares, and keeps healthy. > Btw, that was a significantly more concise and > bandwith-saving answer than I gave. It's a time-budgeting issue ... :) - Dave -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: David Brownell [mailto:david-b@p...] Skickat: den 1 juni 2001 22:07 Till: Bullard, Claude L (Len); Dimitris Dimitriadis Kopia: XML DEV Ämne: Re: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm > But the original question is if the means is > system wide, can they assert ownership of means. "Can" or "should"? Iff it's a private system, there would be no problem in either sense ...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|